We examine how many developers default to market logic—even when they recognize the business case for equitable development—unless stronger external incentives and accountability exist. Through case studies of catalytic developments, we identify obstacles and enabling tactics like community benefits agreements, aligned public-private partnerships, and more intentional oversight by public entities to ensure commitments translate to impact.
We then propose a framework for policymakers, civic leaders, and intermediaries to institutionalize inclusion. We urge them to demand more rigorous accountability, fund capacity building, and align incentives (grant terms, subsidies, procurement rules) so that developers are not just encouraged, but positioned and compelled to deliver equitable outcomes.
Building Better: How real estate developers can create more inclusive catalytic development projects
